Niloo Kumari @ Neelu Devi @ Neelam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87492 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Niloo Kumari @ Neelu Devi @ Neelam Devi W/O Randhir Sah @ Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Gupta R/O Village- Khajuri, Ward No- 08, Police Station- Bhargama, District- Araria 2.

Kundan Kumar Arya @ Kundan Kumar S/O Randhir Sah @ Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Gupta R/O Village- Khajuri, Ward No- 08, Police StationBhargama, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 109, 121(1), 121(2), 61(2), 132, 324(4), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have attacked on the police personnel by sticks and stones in which half dozen police officials were injured and police vehicle was also damaged.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the petitioner no. 1 is lady and was not present at the time of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87492 of 2024(2) dt.08-01-2025 2/2 occurrence. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner no. 1 is the female, let the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

7. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no. 2 on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T