← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87094/2024allowed

Suryakant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-18Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87094 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2024 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Suryakant Kumar Son of Shiv Chaudhary Resident of Village- Pir Bigha, P.S -Salaiya, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

3. Altogether 40 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from the seized motorcycle which belongs to the petitioner. Coaccused Ram Pravesh Kumar was apprehended on the spot.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from his house. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. He was not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87094 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024 2/3 apprehended on the spot. He is not named in the FIR. His name has been transpired in the present case merely because he is the registered owner of the seized motorcycle which was given by the petitioner for repair. He had no knowledge of keeping of the said liquor in the seized vehicle. He has falsely been implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy by planting the aforesaid recovery. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application.

5. Petitioner is agreed to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) in the account of Lawyers' Association Welfare Benevolent Fund, bearing Account No. 7801893276, IFSC Code: IDIB000L501, Indian Bank, LNMI Branch, Bailey Road, Patna.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of eight weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 395 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87094 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024 3/3 2023, subject to the further conditions that

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(2) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

7. The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned Court below on showing receipt of deposit of the aforesaid amount in the account of Lawyers' Association Welfare Benevolent Fund.

8. The learned Court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner has criminal antecedent in similar nature of offence, then the bail bond of the petitioner shall not be accepted by the learned Court below.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T