← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83834/2023dismissed

Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83834 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-631 Year-2023 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar Son Of Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Singh @ Sunil Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh Resident Of Village- Basatpur, P.S.- Mufassil, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Mufassil P.S. Case No. 631 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., East Champaran, Motihari.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have fired upon the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83834 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/2 the petitioner and the informant are resident of same village and due to land dispute between the parties, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the injury report has supported the prosecution case. Hence, he does not deserve privilege of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, and the fact that it is not fit case for anticipatory bail, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T