Ramayan Sahani @ Ramkaran Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81357 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2016 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramayan Sahani @ Ramkaran Sahani S/o Ram Lakhan Sahani Resident of village - Lahladpur, P.S - Madhuban, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 144, 145, 147, 148, 149, 151, 152, 153A, 160, 295, 295A, 297, 298, 395, 341, 323, 504 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of twelve cases, but then the said cases were instituted for the same occurrence and the instant FIR also was instituted for the same occurrence. It is next submitted that informant alleges that on 26-7-2016 at 1:30 pm, when he was at his shop, petitioner along with named accused persons and 350-400 unknown accused came shouting anti muslim slogan and assaulted him and looted articles worth Rs. 3,50,000/- from the shop.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81357 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner has already been granted bail in all other FIRs and from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault shouting slogan is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that as far as allegation of looting articles worth Rs. 3,50,000/- has been alleged, the same is ornamental. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T