Anita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.210 of 2024 ====================================================== Anita Kumari Wife of Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village-Baribagh, P.O. Baribagh, P.S. Khaira, District-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal through its Member, Jamui, P.O. and P.S.-Jamui, District-Jamui.
3.
The District Programme Officer in Office of District Education Officer in Office of District Education.
4.
The District Magistrate, Jamui, P.O. and P.s.-Jamui, District-Jamui. 5.
The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Bishanpur, P.O. Baribagh, P.S. Khaira, District-Jamui.
6.
The Panchayat Secretary cum Selection Unit Gram Panchayat Raj Bishanpur, P.O. Baribagh, P.S. Khaira, District-Jamui. 7.
Soni Kumari W/o Sri Manoj Kumar, D/o Jai Prakash Rai, Resident of Village-Achambho, P.s. Pirhinda, P.s. Sikandra, District Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Standing Counsel 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-01-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within four weeks and the State Appellate Authority is directed to dispose of the same, in
Patna High Court CWJC No.210 of 2024(3) dt.18-01-2025 2/2 accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, after hearing the parties.
5. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the State Appellate Authority, the same shall be considered, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U