← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84030/2024bail granted

Kumar Amarendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-20Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84030 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2022 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Kumar Amarendra Singh Son of Late Arun Kumar Singh @ Late Arun Singh Resident of village - Mohammadpur, P.S.- Shivsagar (Baddi), District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner, along with other accused persons named in the F.I.R., fraudulently sold the land of informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, petitioner is nephew of the informant and the land in question is in share of his father and he has got full right, title and possession to execute the same. It is further submitted that for the same piece of land a title suit bearing Title Suit No. 652 of 2022 is pending before

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84030 of 2024(4) dt.20-03-2025 2/2 the learned Civil Judge Senior Division-1, Sasaram. Moreover, from bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that the dispute is purely civil in nature, with regard to sale and purchase of land and no criminal offence is made out against this petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and nature of dispute, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 269 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T