← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3481/2023disposed

Sarvashree Industrial Briquetting Company Industrial Area, Donar, Darbhanga v. Sandeep Poundrik, Chairman-Cum Managing Director,

2024-07-01Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3481 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1216 of 2021 ====================================================== Sarvashree Industrial Briquetting Company Industrial Area, Donar, Darbhanga through its proprietor, Narendra Kumar Karn, aged about 68 years, Gender Male, Son of late Keshav Lal Das, Resident of Village Ghoghiya, Police Station-Laxmanpur, District-Darbhanga, at Present R/o Housing Colony, HIG-4, Dhanbad, Distt- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sandeep Poundrik, Chairman-cum Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udhyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-4. 2.

Sandeep Poundrik, the Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udhyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-4. 3.

Chandra Shekhar Singh, the Executive Director, Industrial Bihar Area Development Authority, Regional Office, Industrial Area, Donar, Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ujjawal Bhushan, Advocate Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kanushka Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 01-07-2024 The present MJC / contempt application is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 01.09.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1216 of 2021.

2. The petitioner was required to start trial production within three months, fifty per cent of the

Patna High Court MJC No.3481 of 2023(8) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 commercial production within six months, and 75 per per cent of commercial production within 12 months. In this regard, the petitioner has not produced any material to show that he has commenced the trial production within three months. If three months is taken into consideration from the date of order of this court i.e. 01.09.2022 and as on 01.12.2022 the trial production should have been commenced. To that effect, no material information has been placed on record. Similarly, the other two conditions. In the absence of material information, the present contempt petition does not survive for consideration.

3. Accordingly, the present MJC / contempt application stands rejected reserving liberty to file fresh petition.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) GAURAV S./- U