Sonu Ansari @ Md. Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84365 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2024 Thana- SANOKHAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sonu Ansari @ Md. Sonu Son of Late Siraj Ansari @ Md. Sirajuddin Ansari Resident of Village - Kushapur, Police Station - Sanokhar, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md.Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sanokhar P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that the daughter of the informant has been done to death allegedly by the petitioner and her mother-in-law.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 25-06-2024. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84365 of 2024(4) dt.08-04-2025 2/3 counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. Save and except suspicion raised in the FIR itself, there is no cogent material against the petitioner. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that deceased has committed suicide. Charge sheet is submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is mainly contended that the allegation levelled in the FIR corroborates with the postmortem report.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there being no specific allegation against the petitioner in the case dairy and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sanokhar

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84365 of 2024(4) dt.08-04-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 101 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T