Rohit Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81112 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-579 Year-2013 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Rohit Nat Son of Late Buchai Nat Resident of village - Raghopur, P.S.- Bihta, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 326 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner allegedly gave a 'knife' blow in the stomach of the informant

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the occurrence took place on 13.07.2013 where as the FIR has been lodged on 25.08.2013 and the delay in lodging the FIR has not been explained. Learned counsel for the petitioner has conceded that though the injuries caused to the informant were grievous in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81112 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 nature but a perusal of the Annexure-2, shows that the informant has filed a compromise petition before the learned trial Court. It has been submitted that since the parties have compromised the matter and the witnesses are not ready to support the prosecution case, the fate of the case is clear. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.09.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 579 of 2013 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -II, Danapur, Patna.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T