Taufik Anwar @ Jugnu @ Taufik Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76656 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== TAUFIK ANWAR @ JUGNU @ TAUFIK AHMAD Son of Arshad Ahmad Resident of Village - Nuaon, P.S.- Nuaon, Distt.- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Mahila (Bhabua) P.S. Case No. 72 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR petitioner is said to have made physical relationship with the informant on the pretext of marriage but later on he and his family members demanded Rs.2 lac and motorcycle as condition for marriage and petitioner has not married with the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that whole allegation is false and concocted and FIR itself shows that the girl was major and only in order to pressurise the petitioner to marry her the present case has been filed, which will appear from Annexure-2 also, i.e., an agreement between

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76656 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 the parties.

Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioner surrender in the court below within a period of three weeks from the receipt of this order and on surrender he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Mahila (Bhabua) P.S. Case No. 72 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T