← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./377/2019dismissed

Shashank Shekhar Sinha, v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-10The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.377 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17768 of 2018 ====================================================== Shashank Shekhar Sinha, Son of Surendra Prasad Sinha, Resident of MohallaKisan Colony, Anisabad, P.O. Anisabad, Patna 800002. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Hon'ble Patna High Court through its Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna.

3.

The Selection-cum-Appointment Committee, Patna High Court, Patna. 4.

The Registrar General, Patna High Court, Patna. 5.

The Registrar Appointment, Patna High Court, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mr. Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishor (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

This review application is filed for review of the order dated 8.1.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17768 of 2018 (Shashank Shekhar Sinha Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) passed by a Division Bench of this Court.

Shockingly, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition post dismissal of the Special Leave Petition assailing

Patna High Court C. REV. No.377 of 2019(4) dt.10-01-2020 2/2 the very same judgment, subject matter of review, dated 8th January, 2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 17768 of 2018 (Shashank Shekhar Sinha Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.).

The present petition, in our considered view, is totally misconceived and, in fact, an abuse of the process of law. Only for the reason that a co-ordinate Bench has taken a view other than the one taken in the said decision post dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, cannot be a reason sufficient enough to review our judgment.

The application is dismissed.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U