Abhimanyu Singh @ Abhimanu Singh @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Manu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83959 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-605 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Abhimanyu Singh @ Abhimanu Singh @ Abhimanyu Kumar @ Manu Singh Son of Late Sidheshwar Singh Resident of Village - Kumhau, P.S. - Sasaram (T), District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammed Arif , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 127, 115 (2), 109, 3 (5) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita ( B N S ) Act and 25 (1-b)/a/26/27/35 of Arms Act.
3 . The prosecution case in brief, is that on the alleged date and time of occurrence , this petitioner along with 5 other unknown persons, was standing at Durga Mandir and asked the informant to come there for a talk regarding an old land dispute . It is further alleged that when the informant along with his brother Ankit Pandey, went there, in the meanwhile this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83959 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/3 petitioner and co-accused Ramashu Singh fired upon them, as a result of which one of the bullets hit above the waist of the brother of the informant, Ankit Pandey .
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that as per the F.I.R., the petitioner and co-accused Ramashu Singh are alleged to have fired gunshot but during the course of the investigation , and in paras 18, 19, and 20 of the case diary, prosecution witnesses who claimed to have seen the occurrence injured, have stated that on the order of this petitioner, coaccused Ramanshu Singh fired upon Ankit Pandey . Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition .
6 Considering the materials available on record, clean antecedent of the petitioner and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram Town P.S. Case No. 605 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83959 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 3/3 2023 .
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U