Surendra Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary, Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1772 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Nalanda ====================================================== SURENDRA PRASAD SINGH Son of Late Chetlal Mahto @ Chet Narayan Prasad Resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.O-Kachiyama, P.S-Nagarnausa, District-Nalanda at present address at Mohalla-Gautambuddh Colony, near Ganga Valley School, Agamkuan, P.S-Bypass, District-Patna. .. ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA Patna 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. Patna. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Biharsharif, District-Nalanda. Nalanda.

4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nalanda at Biharsharif, DistrictNalanda. Nalanda. 5.

The SHO, Nagarnausa, P.S-Nagarnausa, Hilsa, District-Nalanda. Nalanda. 6.

Prashant Kumar @ Pinku Son of Late Sadhu Saran Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Postal Park Road no.3, P.O and P.S-Jakkanpur, District-Patna at present Resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.O-Kachiyama, P.S.-Nagarnausa, District-Nalanda.

7.

Smt. Chandra Kanti Devi Wife of Late Sadhu Saran Prasad Resident of Mohalla-Postal Park Road no.3, P.O and P.S-Jakkanpur, District-Patna at present Resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.O-Kachiyama, P.S.-Nagarnausa, District-Nalanda.

8.

Smt. Mridula Devi Wife of Prashant Kumar @ Pinku Resident of MohallaPostal Park Road no.3, P.O and P.S-Jakkanpur, District-Patna at present Resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.O-Kachiyama, P.S.-Nagarnausa, DistrictNalanda. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 The petitioner in this case is seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to lodge a first information report. In course of argument learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to demonstrate that before moving this Court, the petitioner has complied with the requirements as

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1772 of 2019(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 explained in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. Vs. The State of U. P. & Ors. reported in AIR 2015 SC 1758.

This Court is therefore, not inclined to entertain the present writ application. It is left open for the petitioner to seek his remedy before the appropriate court in accordance with law and judicial pronouncement on the subject.

The writ application stands disposed of.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U