Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74035/2019bail granted

Suraj Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-11Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74035 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== SURAJ CHAUHAN, Male, aged about 21 years, Son of Naresh Chauhan @ Naresh, Resident of Village - Rudawaliya, P.S.- Turkapatti, Distt - Kushinagar (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is while riding on a stolen motorcycle he was apprehended by the police with stolen motorcycle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 28.08.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74035 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Gopalganj, in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 301 of 2019, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T