Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83325 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rinku Devi W/o- Mohan Ray Village- Raghunathpur P.S - Sahebpur Kamal, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, arising out of Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 498A and Section 34 of the I.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 19.02.2025, passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 6294 of 2025, regular bail petition of the petitioner was rejected. However, it was stipulated by this Court in para-12 of the order that the petitioner is at liberty to renew her prayer after framing of charge in the case.

4. He further submits that the charge has been framed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83325 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 in the case and a copy of the order has been also brought on record.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on her furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Begusarai/concerned Court below in connection with S.T. P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, arising out of Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024 on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of her absence or non-cooperation. She must be available to the police or the court whenever her presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83325 of 2025(2) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 below that the petitioner has criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing her and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T