Shrikant Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83939 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2023 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Shrikant Yadav Son Of Late Ramsagar Yadav Resident Of Village - Lachhutola, P.S. - Ara Mufassil (Dhobha O.P.), District - Bhojpur 2.
Raj Kumar Yadav Son Of Parmeshwar Yadav Resident Of Village - Lachhutola, P.S. - Ara Mufassil (Dhobha O.P.), District - Bhojpur 3.
Gandhi Kumar @ Gandhi Yadav @ Pawan Yadav Son Of Shrikant Yadav Resident Of Village - Lachhutola, P.S. - Ara Mufassil (Dhobha O.P.), District - Bhojpur 4.
Dilip Kumar Yadav Son Of Shrikant Yadav Resident Of Village - Lachhutola, P.S. - Ara Mufassil (Dhobha O.P.), District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 379, 354, 504, 506 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused have assaulted the informant side with deadly weapons due to issue of main path of informant's house. Petitioner no. 4 has assaulted the informant with lathi on his head and petitioner no. 3 tried to outrage the modesty of daughter-in-law of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83939 of 2023(2) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. There is case is counter case between the parties annexed as annexure -3 in the petition. Nature of the injury of the informant is simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature of injury is simple, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ara Mufassil (Dhobha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 274 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T