Ashraf Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76516 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-660 Year-2019 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== ASHRAF ALAM Son of Mohmmad Aslam @ Asalam Miyan R/o Vill. Sathi, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Immoral Trafficking Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was indulged in immoral activities.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Similarly placed co-accused namely Pradeep Kumar has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.11.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 75892 of 2019. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76516 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 and is in custody since 06.09.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Bettiah (T) P.S. Case No. 660 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T