Dr. Aseem Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar, Through Mr. Anjani Kr. Singh, Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1004 of 2018 In LPA 655 of 2016 ====================================================== Dr. Aseem Kumar Thakur Son of late Kameshwar Thakur Resident of Flat No. 17, Subha Vila, Kurzi Mor, P.s Patliputra District Patna Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, Through Mr. Anjani Kr. Singh, Chief Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. Mrs. Ansuli Arya The Principal Secretary, Department of Science & Technology ,Government of Bihar,Patna.
3. Mr. Sushant Jha,The Additional Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Bihar Patna.
4. Mr. Mirza Arif Raza,The Deputy Secretary, Department of Science & Teachnology ,Government of Bihar,Patna.
5. Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commissioner, Patna, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
6. Dr. Barun Kumar Rai, Rajkiya Mahila Polytechnic College, Muzaffarpur, Patna.
7. Dr. Anil Kumar Singh, New Government Polytechnic College, Patna13.
8. Dr. Kumari Arnima, Principal, Rajkiya Mahila College, Phulwari, Patna.
9. Dr.
Chandrashekhar Singh, Government Polytechnic College, Muzaffarpur.
10. Dr. Fazle Sarwar, Government Polytechnic, Motihari. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anshuman Jaipuriyar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi - AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 26-06-2018 Keeping in view the notification issued on 5.6.2018 directing for appointment of the petitioner, we further direct that within seven days from today posting order should be issued to
Patna High Court MJC No.1004 of 2018 (4) dt.26-06-2018 2/2 the petitioner and within seven days thereafter the petitioner should permitted to join the post in question. If not, the petitioner shall have liberty to point out the same to this Court on which this Court may consider taking action against the respondent concerned.
With the aforesaid, without initiating any contempt for the present, we dispose of the matter.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) K.C.jha/- U