Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6957 of 2018 ====================================================== Sunita Kumari Wife of Rakesh Ranjan Gupta, D/o Late Sitaram Prasad Gupta, resident of Village P.O. Nauhatta, Block P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

5.

The District Mass Education Officer, Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.A.R. Pandey - AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.). and the same may be disposed off accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC

Patna High Court CWJC No.6957 of 2018(3) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."

3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U