← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7109/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Mrityunjay Kumar @ Mrityunjay Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7109 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Mrityunjay Kumar @ Mrityunjay Singh and Ors son of Kauleshwar Singh resident of village - Rapura, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad. 2.

Kumar Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh son of Kauleshwar Singh resident of village - Repura, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad. 3.

Satyendra Yadav son of Beni Yadav resident of village - Rohidas Khap, P.S. - Kutumba, District - Aurangabad.

4.

Malti Devi wife of Ravi Shankar Singh resident of Mohalla - Sahpur Tikri, P.S. - Town, District - Aurangabad.

5.

Kumar Arun son of Masafir Singh resident of village - Mokhtarpur, P.S. - Khudwan, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Secretary, Department of Administrative Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

5.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2024 Despite repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners, however, learned counsel for the State appeared.

2. From the order dated 20.03.2024 also, it transpires that upon repeated call, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned.

3. Today also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CWJC No. 7109 of 2018(4) dt.08-04-2024 2/2

4. It transpires to this Court that counsel for the petitioners has no interest to pursue this case.

5. In this view of the matter, the present writ application is dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J) sadique/- U