← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80816/2025bail granted

Ajay Kumar Sahani @ Ajay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80816 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Sahani @ Ajay Sahani Son of Jailal Sahani @ Jayram Sahani R/o village - Madhopur Bara, P.S.- Taraiya, Dist.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumarm, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 382 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 120 litres of liquor has been recovered from boat. It is further alleged that total 10,000 litres of semi fermented liquor was destroyed on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local people. No incriminating article has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80816 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/3 been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from boat but the same does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2025 and has six criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 382 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80816 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T