Md. Noor Alam @ Noor Alam @ Nooralam v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21686 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-778 Year-2016 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Noor Alam @ Noor Alam @ Nooralam son of Md. Jamil Akhtar, resident of village Parsauni, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State Of Bihar

2. Raushan Khatoon w/o Md. Noor Alam @ Noor Alam @ Nooralam, resident of village Parsauni, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani, at prseent Raushan Khatoon, D/o Ramjan Ali, R/o village Parsauni, P.S. Bheja, District Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 379, 354, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, but cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 504, 498A of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21686 of 2018(2) dt.11-04-2018 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with C.R. case No.778 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T