Kishu Kumar @ Rohan @ Kinshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84399 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2024 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Kishu Kumar @ Rohan @ Kinshu Kumar Son of Lalbabu Prasad Resident of village- Sasamusa, PS- Kochaikot, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabish Kumar, Advocate Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 365 & 366A of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that informant reported that his daughter was kidnapped on 18-02-2024, while out for shopping and despite searching, she was not found. The next day, he received a ransom call demanding Rs. 15 Lakh and he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84399 of 2024(3) dt.25-02-2025 2/3 suspected petitioner for kidnapping her daughter. 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 19-102-2024. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent/s, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, 2023 has herself deposed that she was in love with the petitioner since five years and she had gone with the petitioner at her own volition. Learned counsel next submits that victim has refused for her medical examination. There is no ingredient of Section 366A of the IPC against the petitioner. Charge sheet is submitted in this case. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84399 of 2024(3) dt.25-02-2025 3/3 bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 130 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T