Anil Giri @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80706 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-609 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Anil Giri @ Anil Kumar S/O Maheshwar Giri R/O Vill- Ram Math, P.S.- Belsar, District- Vaishali 2.
Rahul Giri @ Rahul Kumar S/O Jitendra Giri R/O Vill- Ram Math, P.S.- Belsar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Ms.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 609 of 2025 instituted under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant.
4. The petitioner no. 1 is said to have assaulted the informant with a rod causing simple injury.
5. Considering the fact that the injury caused to the informant are simple in nature, this application is allowed with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80706 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 regard to petitioner no. 1 only.
6. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner no. 1, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur/ concerned Court in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 609 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 of the BNSS/ 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
7. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted the wife of the informant on her left hand by lathi causing fracture and grievous injury.
8. Considering the nature of injury sustained, the application on behalf of the petitioner no. 2 is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T