Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84389 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-814 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ Jitendra Yadav Son of Late Sugdev Yadav @ Suryadev Yadav Resident of Village- Lalganj, P.S. - Dukri, District - Baliya (UP) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise PS Case No. 814 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a), 32(1), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 910.320 litres of foreign liquor was recovered from the Tractor. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84389 of 2024(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/2 vehicle. Petitioner is a labour and he has no knowledge regarding the goods laden in the vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise PS Case No. 814 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T