Muniya Khatoon @ Mustari Parveen @ Mustari Praveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82302 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2024 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Muniya Khatoon @ Mustari Parveen @ Mustari Praveen W/O Md. Anwar Quraishi @ Mumtaj Quraishi @ Israil Kuraishi Resident of villageHemjapur, P.S- Mohanpur, Dist-Gaya. 2.

Isramal Quraishi @ Israil Miyan @ Israil Kuraishi Son of Nur Miyan. Resident of village- Hemjapur, P.S- Mohanpur, Dist-Gaya. 3.

Imtiyaz Quraishi @ Md. Imtiyaz Son of Mumtaj Quraishi. Resident of village- Hemjapur, P.S- Mohanpur, Dist-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 427, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. On account of theft of mobile, which took place in the year 2000, a dispute has arisen and thereupon it is alleged that the petitioners along with others have brutally assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that on the account of brick batting, the injury has also sustained to the minor daughter of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82302 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/3 the informant. There is further allegation that the accused persons have also damaged the motorcycle.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that with regard to an occurrence, which took place on 02.03.2024, for the first time the information has been given on 04.03.2024 and thereafter, the FIR came to be instituted on 05.03.2024. It is further submitted that even if the allegation is taken to be true, there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Moreover, the injuries, which are allegedly sustained to the informant, are concerned, the same has been found to be a lacerated wound but does not disclose about the final nature of injury. So far as the injury which is sustained by the daughter of the informant is concerned, there is no whisper in the impugned order. In fact, she has not sustained any injury. The petitioners bear fair antecedent and undertake that they will fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court.

5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the petitioners have actively participated in the crime.

6. Having considered the omnibus nature of accusation coupled with the fair antecedent of the petitioners and delay in lodging of the FIR, let, the above named

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82302 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 3/3 petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-2, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 148 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.

(Harish Kumar, J) shailendra/- U T