Nagina Pd. Yadav @ Nagina Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81826 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2019 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Nagina Pd. Yadav @ Nagina Prasad Yadav Son of Jagan Rai Resident of Village - Baidhnathpur, P.S.- Chiraiya, District - East Champaran 2.

Manoj Rai @ Manoj Kumar Son of Nagina Rai Resident of Village - Baidhnathpur, P.S.- Chiraiya, District - East Champaran 3.

Manager Pd. Yadav @ Manager Yadav Son of Surya Rai@Sury Rai Resident of Village - Chorma, P.S.- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Ms. Shiwani Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 324, 504, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per F.I.R., these petitioners along with two unknown miscreants assaulted on the head of informant by means of knife and snatched gold locket worth Rs. 30,000/- and Rs. 12,000/- from his pocket.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81826 of 2025(6) dt.13-03-2026 2/2 Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law of the informant and due to matrimonial dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged against these petitioners. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and injuries, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 227 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T