Mahendra Lal Roy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80417 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2025 Thana- Madhubani T District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Mahendra Lal Roy S/o Late Manik Lal Roy Resident of Village - Rajendra Nagar, Madhubani, P.S - Madhubani, District - Purnia 2.
Manpavitra Lal Roy S/o Mahendra Lal Roy Resident of Village - Rajendra Nagar, Madhubani, P.S - Madhubani, District - Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Praveen For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025
1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. & Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on dispute relating to wedding card, Mahendra assaulted him with sword but he managed to save himself and started fleeing when Man Pavitra and Anand both sons of Mahendra started indiscriminate firing and Saurav
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80417 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 started pelting stones from the terrace and the occurrence was video-graphed.
4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that informant is own nephew of Mahendra and are having dispute relating to property. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no one was injured in the occurrence and the allegations are exaggerated.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but then are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that no one was injured in the occurrence.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80417 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhubani P.S. Case No.40/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T