Lalo Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86253 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2024 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
Lalo Paswan Son of Late Asrafi Paswan @ Asarfi Paswan Resident of Village- Piprahari Ward No. 14, P.S.- and District- Supaul 2.
Anil Paswan Son of Lalo Paswan Resident of Village- Piprahari Ward No. 14, P.S.- and District- Supaul 3.
Sushil Paswan @ Sudhir Paswan Son of Lalo Paswan Resident of VillagePiprahari Ward No. 14, P.S.- and District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, learned APP for the State.
2. The instant application for anticipatory bail have been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 197 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 332, 333, 353, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner who is a Chowkidar has gone to serve notice of Section 107/116 of Cr.P.C. It is alleged that the petitioners along with others abused and assaulted him by means of slap and fist. It is further alleged that a golden chain was also snatched.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners have submitted that petitioners are innocent and have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86253 of 2024(2) dt.20-12-2024 2/2 committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that the informant and the petitioners share the same courtyard and there are many cases against each other. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that there is only allegation of assaulting with slaps and fist.
5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer of bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 197 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T