Dr. Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18520 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.
Dr. Satish Kumar Son of Chandra Deo Rajak, Resident of Qtr. No. 2515, Street 24 near 8/B Middle School, Post Office- Sector 9, Police Station - Bokaro, District - Bokaro At present, 29, Assam Rifles, Shilong, Meghalaya. 2.
Dr Santosh Kumar Sudhakar Son of Sri Laxmi Prasad, Resident of 101, Shivayan Paradise, Hanuman Nagar, Kali Mandir Road, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna. At present - Posted as Medical Officer, National Institute of Technology, Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.
The Joint Secretary to the Government, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.
The Principal, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Government Pleader (6) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2024 Heard Mr. Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned GP no.6 for the State.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners informs this Court that for the relief(s) as prayed for in the present writ petition, the petitioners have filed several representations before the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar and no action has been taken by him on those representations of the petitioners.
3. Considering the aforesaid submissions made on
Patna High Court CWJC No.18520 of 2024(2) dt.05-12-2024 2/2 behalf of the petitioners, the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar is forthwith directed to consider the representations of the petitioners in accordance with law without any further delay and in case, he makes delay any more in disposal of the representations of the petitioners by giving reasons, the petitioners may take legal action for the said purpose in accordance with law.
4. With the above observation/directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U