← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18776/2024dismissed

Ravinder Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-27Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18776 of 2024 ====================================================== Ravinder Sahni S/o Nageena Sahani Resident of Sikatia PS Sidhwalia District-Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Co-Operative, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Co-operative, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Secretary, Bihar State Election Authority, Harding Road, Patna. 4.

The Registrar, Cooperative Society, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate-Cum-District Election Officer, PACS, Gopalganj. 6.

The District Co-operative Officer-Cum-Deputy District Election (CoOperative), Gopalganj. 7.

The Block Development Officer-Cum-Returning Officer, Barauli Block, Gopalganj.

8.

The Chairman, Managing Committee Rampur (Outgonig Chairman Rampur, PACS), Barauli Block, Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Vardhan, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Divya Verma, AC to AAG-3 For the Election Authority: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Election Authority.

2. Learned counsel for the Election Authority has produced the notification dated 24.01.2025 which suggests that the Election Authority has announced the date for election of Rampur PAACS.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18776 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the notification issued by the Election Authority, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and as such he seeks permission to withdraw the petition as having become infructuous.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U