← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80958/2025bail granted

Siya Ram Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-15Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80958 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- Chitragupta Nagar District- Khagaria ====================================================== Siya Ram Choudhary Son of Dinesh Choudhary R/o Terai Pir Pahaar, Ward no. - 06, P.S. - Muffasil, Dist. - Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saurabh Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chitraguptnagar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 26(i)(ii) & 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that one illegal mini gun factory was running at a particular locality which was raided and three persons including the petitioner were apprehended and the seizure list was prepared.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80958 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. The other coaccused has been granted bail by this Bench on 19.11.2025 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 68512 of 2025. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025 has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chitraguptnagar P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T