Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75171 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2019 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Santosh Yadav Son of Umesh Yadav, Resident of Village-Devari-Pipra, P.S.- Parbatta (Maraiya), Distt-Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Shanker Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.354 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 341, 323, 307, 506, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation has been made to have caused injury on the leg of the victim. When the persons came to intercept him, he resorted blank firing.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits, in fact, the informant is a money lender and the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2019 having clean antecedent.

Looking to the entirety of the facts and circumstance

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75171 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.354 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a close relative. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner would repeat the same offence in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T