Shyambabu Mahto @ Shyamababu Mahato @ Shyambabu Mahato v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82063 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Shyambabu Mahto @ Shyamababu Mahato @ Shyambabu Mahato S/o Sudarshan Mahto @ Sudarshan Mahato R/o vill - Newajitola Dharmshala, P.s. - Rivilganj, Distt.- Saran, Bihar 2.
Bali Ram Mahto S/o Late Lal Babu Mahto R/o vill - Newajitola Dharmshala, P.S.- Rivilganj, Distt.- Saran, Bihar 3.
Guru Dayal Prasad @ Tinku S/o Ram Ayodhaya Prasad R/o ward no. 29, Mohalla - Rupganj, P.S.- Chapra Town, Distt.- Saran, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 308(5), 303(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is of taking illegal possession of the house of the informant and committing theft in his shop.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. It is further submitted that the land in question was purchased by Late Shaligram Prasad from Late Ramayan Prasad in the year 1970. It is also submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82063 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 informant has taken the property, mentioned in the FIR, on rent which was vacated by him and in support of this fact, he has annexed the document (Annexure-P/6) and subsequently the petitioner entered into an agreement regarding that property (Annexure-P/4) so there is every chance of false implication of these petitioners and the informant has nothing to do with this property taken on rent by the petitioners.
5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, who have no criminal antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.457 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T