Makina Khatoon @ Makina Khatun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82399 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Makina Khatoon @ Makina Khatun Wife of Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @ Md. Dilesher Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District - Begusarai.

2.

Md. Dilsher @ Md. Dilsed @ Md. Dilesher Son of Md. Kamal Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mobina Khatoon Wife of Md. Kismat Resident of Village - Dhabauli, P.S.- Lakho, District - Begusarai.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.

For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in Mahila P. S. Case No. 46 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 65, 89, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 4, 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

3. As per F.I.R., co-accused Md. Naushad sexually exploited minor daughter of the informant. These petitioners are parents of co-accused Md. Naushad and informant alleges they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82399 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 assured her to marry their son with the daughter of informant but later on, refused to do so and aborted the pregnancy by giving her pills.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Specific accusation of sexual assault is against co-accused Md. Naushad and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, gravity of the offence, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T