Subodh Thakur @ Subodh Kumar @ Sri Subodh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80175 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2019 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Subodh Thakur @ Subodh Kumar @ Sri Subodh Thakur S/O Late Rajendra Thakur The then Revenue Clerk at present posted as Circle Office, Beldour, R/O Village- Sondiha, P.S- Pasraha, Distt.- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, in connivance with one Shailendra Kumar created a forged map and registered-2 in the year 2017 with respect to Jamabandi No. 1081 to 11090.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is a government servant and from perusal of Annexure-3, it transpires that he has handed over a charge of Halka No. 6 to one Ram Sewak Singh. Upon going through the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80175 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 list of registers, it is clear that Patpar Themtha Mouza is the place where the alleged interpolation has been made and the register of that mouza is also included in the list. It is further submitted that the petitioner had been transferred prior to the date of occurrence. It is also submitted that the petitioner is a government servant and he will duly co-operate in the trial, and there is no question of avoiding the trial. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 22.09.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 465 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -1st, Khagaria.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T