Rehana Praveen @ Rehna Parveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84603 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI RAIL P.S. District- Katihar ====================================================== Rehana Praveen @ Rehna Parveen Daughter of Md Mustaque Wife of Late Md. Parwej @ Md. Parwej Alam, Resident of Village - Bhotariya, P.S. - Amour, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Nadimul Hasan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Abu Nasar, Md. Jawed, Md. Mushtaque, Devi Marjeena and Md. Kareem have killed the husband of the petitioner. It is also alleged that Abu Nasar is the fiance of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the FIR itself it is clear that there is direct allegation against Abu Nasar and Md. Jawed that they have assaulted with knife and iron rod. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no allegation of any overt act against the petitioner in the FIR. It has further been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84603 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 submitted that she has lost her husband and she has been made accused in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in judicial custody since 30.09.2024. It has further been submitted that Abu Nasar was having allegation of killing the husband of the petitioner and he has been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 40181 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Jogbani Rail P.S. Case No. 09 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T