← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/460/2024disposed

Ram Bilas Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-21Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.460 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Bilas Ray Son of Late Rangi Lal Ray Resident of Village-Dashara, Bhograjpur, P.S.-Patory, District-Samastipur. 2.

Santosh Ray @ Santosh Kumar, Son of Nand Kishore Ray, Resident of Village-Dashara, Bhograjpur, P.S.-Patory, District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary 2.

The Collector, Samastipur Road Construction Department 3.

The District Land Acquisition Samastipur.

4.

National Highwary Authority of India, through its Regional Officer, Patliputra Colony Road Block (A) Patliputra Colony Patna Bihar. 5.

The Regional Officer, National Highwary Authority of Inida, Patliputra Colony Road Block (A) Patliputra Colony Patna Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General (12) For NHAI :

Ms. Soni Srivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-02-2024 Heard Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Nutan Sahay, learned AAG-12 and Ms. Soni Srivastava, learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India.

2. The petitioners have prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ restraining the respondents from demolishing the part of his house situated on his raiyati land for widening of NH-122 running from Jadua to Murli Tole without acquisition and/or payment of compensation and/or for the same.

Patna High Court CWJC No.460 of 2024(2) dt.21-02-2024 2/2

3. There is nothing on record and/or sale deed to show that the land belongs to petitioners and in that case, they are well advised to approach the appropriate authority/Court for the redressal of their grievance.

4. Ms. Soni Srivastva, learned counsel for the NHAI submits that the matter actually relates to NH-122B and not NH122 and there is nothing on record to show that any acquisition/encroachment/demolition has taken place.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to seek remedy in accordance with law. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U