Vinod Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76258 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-507 Year-2019 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vinod Ray S/o Vindeshwar Ray R/o Village- Abdulpur, P.S.- Mahua, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 02-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 507 of 2019 registered for the offences under Section 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner and another accused were chased and caught with a stolen motorcycle bearing registration No. BR 31Z 6062. It is further stated that on the confession of both the caught accused persons, further stolen motorcycles were also recovered. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the FIR are false and concocted. From perusal of the seizure list enclosed with the instant FIR with respect to the motorcycle having been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76258 of 2019(2) dt.02-12-2019 2/2 recovered from the petitioner with the copy of the Registration Certificate which is on record as Annexure 2 to the application, it would transpire that the said stolen motorcycle actually belongs to the mother-in-law of the petitioner. The petitioner has made statement to this effect in paragraph no. 6 of the application. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2019.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 507 of 2019.
(Partha Sarthy, J) uma/- U T