Mritunjay Kumar v. The State Bank Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9388 of 2018 ====================================================== Mritunjay Kumar S/o-Shri Surendra Narayan Singh, R/o MohallaMithanpura, "Shanti Sadan' Madnani Lane, P.O.-Ramna, P.S.-Mithanpura, District-Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Bank Of India through Chairman cum Managing Director, Corporate Centre, 8th Floor, State Bank Bhawan, Madame Kama Road, Mumbai-400021 2.
Chairman Cum Managing Director, State Bank of India, 8th Floor, State Bank Bhawan, Madame Kama Road, Mumbai-400021 3.
Reviewing Authority through Chairman Cum Managing Director, State Bank of India, 8th Floor, State Bank Bhawan, Madame Kama Road, Mumbai-400021 4.
Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Patna. 5.
General Manager (Network III) Cum Appointing Authority, S.B.I., Local Head Office West Gandhi, Patna 6.
Deputy General Manager (B & O), State Bank of India, Muzaffarpur Zone, Administrative Office, Club Road, Muzaffarpur. 7.
Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Regional Branch Office, Bettiah. 8.
Sachidanand Sinha, Branch Manager of Gaunaha Branch, State Bank of India, West Champaran, Bettiah presently posted as Branch Manager of Mahuwawa Branch, State Bank of India, Misraulia, P.S.-Chiraia, DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Upon repeated call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Counsel for the State is present.
2. Upon perusal of the records, it transpires to this Court that this matter has been adjourned 5 times on the request of Counsel for the petitioner vide orders dated 22.03.2022,
Patna High Court CWJC No.9388 of 2018(11) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 05.04.2022, 10.05.2022, 22.11.2024 & 03.01.2025. And today also no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In this view of the matter, it transpires to this Court that petitioner is not interested to pursue this case and therefore, this writ petition is hereby dismissed due to non prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U