Punam Rani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2260 of 2025 ====================================================== Punam Rani wife of Ramesh Kumar Mehta, Resident of Village Manjora, Ward No. 10, P.S. Bihariganj, Block Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate, Madhepura.
4.
The District Programme officer, Establishment, Madhepura. 5.
The District Education officer, Madhepura.
6.
The Block Development officer, Udakishunganj, District Madhepura. 7.
The Block Education officer, Udakishunganj, District Madhepura. 8.
The Mukhiya, Biri Ranpal Gram Panchayat, Udakishunganj, District - Madhepura.
9.
The Panchayat Secretary, Biri Ranpal Gram Panchayat, Block - Udakishunganj, District - Madhepura.
10.
The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Madhepura. 11.
Kalpana Kumari daughter of Late Shyam Kishor Gupta, Resident of Village and P.S. - Bihariganj, Ward No. 15, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Standing Counsel-21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the prayer made in this writ application, it appears that the petitioner has moved before this Court without availing the alternative and efficacious remedy as available to him in law.
3. In such view of the matter, this writ application is
Patna High Court CWJC No.2260 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of 30 days and the concerned authority is directed to dispose of the appeal in accordance with law without being impeded by the issue of limitation.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U