Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75245/2019bail granted

Sanjit Kumar Mahto @ Sanjit Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75245 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== SANJIT KUMAR MAHTO @ SANJIT MAHTO Son of Tunlal Mahto Resident of Village - Makhachak Ward No. 6, P.S.- Bakhri, Distt - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Satyadeo Singh Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 26-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2019 in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 308 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of about 351 litres of foreign liquor from three different spots. The petitioner has neither been apprehended from the spot nor any incriminating articles has been recovered from his conscious possession, rather he was remanded to custody in the present case after he was arrested in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 189 of 2019.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75245 of 2019(2) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai, in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No. 308 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T