Vinod Ram @ Binod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82153 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Vinod Ram @ Binod Kumar Son of Jaleshwar Ram Resident of VillageLahi, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran 2.

Rahul Kumar son of Madan Ram Resident of Village- Lahi, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran 3.

Subhas Ram son of Lalu Ram Resident of Village- Lahi, P.S. Madhuban, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Mukhiya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 296, 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the accused persons were playing vulgar songs in a marriage, as such, the informant objected, leading to an altercation and Santosh dashed the informant on the ground and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82153 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/3 assaulted her, thereafter Dinbandhu torn her clothes, further Santosh assaulted Nagendra by an iron rod causing injury on head, thereafter accused persons also assaulted seven named injured causing injury while Rohit and Mithilesh snatched informant's gold Jitiya.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the date of occurrence is 05.06.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 09.06.2025 after a delay of four days without any plausible explanation. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegations, as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners and even women members of the family have been implicated. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.

5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82153 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2026 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.193 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T