Gajo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19465 of 2024 ====================================================== Gajo Yadav Son of Late Gulo Prasad Yadav @ Gulab Yadav, Resident of village- Hathmandal, P.S. - Banma Itahari, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.
3.
District Magistrate-cum-Colletor, District- Saharsa. 4.
Addl. Collector, District - Saharsa.
5.
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa. 6.
D.C.L.R, Simri, Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa. 7.
Anchal Adhikari, Banma Itahari, Dist. Saharsa. 8.
Janardan Yadav, Son of Late Batan Yadav, Resident of Village- Manauri, P.S. - Sonbarsa Raj, District - Saharsa.
9.
Parvesh Yadav, Son of Late Batan Yadav, resident of village- Manauri, P.S.- Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa.
10.
Vidhyanand Yadav, Son of Late Suryanarayan Yadav, resident of villageHathmandal, P.S. - Banma, Ithari, District - Saharsa. 11.
Subodh Yadav, Son of Late Suryanarayan Yadav, resident of villageHathmandal, P.S. - Banma, Ithari, District - Saharsa. 12.
Jawahar Yadav, Son of Late Suryanarayan Yadav, resident of villageHathmandal, P.S. - Banma, Ithari, District - Saharsa. 13.
Ashutosh Bhaskar @ Sunil Yadav, Son of Late Suryanarayan Yadav, resident of village- Hathmandal, P.S. - Banma, Ithari, District - Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Government Pleader, 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):
Patna High Court CWJC No.19465 of 2024(2) dt.07-01-2025 2/2 (i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or writs, direction or directions, commanding upon the State respondents specially the District Magistrate, Saharsa to get reconstructed house of the petitioner, which has been broken by respondent nos.8 to 13 forcibly making the petitioner homeless and to restore the possession of the petitioner land bearing R.S.P. No.3018 over which the petitioner house was standing situated in Village - Hathmandal, P.S. & Anchal Itahari, District Saharsa.
(ii) To pass any other order/orders as this Court thinks fit & proper under the facts & circumstances of this case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate petition before the appropriate authority.
4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.
5. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this case is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T