← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./80615/2025disposed

Rani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-10Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80615 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-795 Year-2025 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Rani Kumari D/o- Late Girja Choudhary Resident of Lal Kothi Near Middle School P.S- Danapur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedents of two cases and is a woman and allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a Scooty. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and she came to be implicated based on the fact that she is owner of the seized Scooty. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use her own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus, would create evidence against herself and hence, would

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80615 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3 get implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Randhir Kumar would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who was also apprehended from the spot.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on her furnishing bail-bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Excise Judge, Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.795 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

6. The application stands allowed.

7. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bond of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80615 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed her antecedent before this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedents of only two cases, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T