Patna High CourtC. REV./147/2018allowed

Md. Shaiqur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.147 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2586 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Shaiqur Rahman Son of Late Md. Raziqur Rahman, Resident of Mohalla-Alamganj, District-Patna, Presently Posted and Working in I/C Headmaster in Govt. Middle School, Rampur Dih Shahkund P.s. Sazaur, District-Bhagalpur, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Chief Information Commissioner, Suchna Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna through its Secretary.

3. The State Information Commission of Bihar Suchna Bhawan, Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The District Education, Officer, Bhagalpur.

5. The Block Education Officer, Shahkund, District-Bhagalpur.

6. Sanijul Fatma, Wife of Md. Azimuddin, Resident of Village- Radhanagar, P.S. Sazaur, District-Bhagalpur, Presently Posted and Working as Block Teacher In Govt. Middle School, Rampur Dih P.S. Sazaur, District-Bhagalpur

7. Baidyanath Ram, Son of not known, an Assistant teacher in Govt. Middle School, Rampur Dih, Shahkund, P.S. Sazaur, District-Bhagalpur

8. Sanjay Sharma, Son of Late Paryag Sharma Resident of Village-Hasanchak, P.S. Nathnagar District-Bhagalpur

9. The Headmaster-cum-D.D.O. of Middle School Shahkund (Boys) Sazaur, District-Bhagalpur.

... ... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opp.Parties :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ( AAG 15 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 In view of the liberty granted by this Court while disposing of the writ petition by order dated 19.4.2018, the writ petition, CWJC No. 2586 of 2017, is revived. Civil Review application stands allowed and disposed of.

The Opposite Parties have to explain the statements

Patna High Court C. REV. No.147 of 2018(5) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 made at the time of disposal of the writ petition that payment of Rs. 25,000/-, recovered from the petitioner, has already been made. It was stated on behalf of the State that refund of that amount has already been made in order to impress upon the Court that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed although such payment was not made by the respondents to the petitioner.

Put up the writ petition before the appropriate Bench. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U