Krishna Murari Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11254 of 2018 ====================================================== Krishna Murari Singh Son of Late Ishwari Singh, Resident of VillageChandinovan, P.O.P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada at present residing at Garbhuchak, Jagdeo Path, P.O.- B.V. College, P.S.- Hawai Adda, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
District Magistrate, Nawada.
3.
Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Nawada.
4.
Circle Officer, Kashichak, Nawada.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Hriday Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Vinay Kriti Singh- GA 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 20.6.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: "For issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents authorities to take appropriate action for removing the encroachment in the public road of village- Chandinovan in the interest of Public because there is famous temple of Goddess Druga in the village Chandinova."
Patna High Court CWJC No.11254 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.Jha/- U