Ram Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1383 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2022 Thana- ANDHRATHARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Ram Kumar Thakur Son Of Late Rupan Thakur R/O Village- Dumariyahi, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani 2.
Shiv Kumar Thakur Son Of Late Rupan Thakur R/O Village- Dumariyahi, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani 3.
Dayanand Thakur S/O Ram Kumar Thakur R/O Village- Dumariyahi, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Tejpratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 353, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons have misbehaved and abused the informant and took away seized articles of sawmill.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioners were running carpenter wood shop and no license is required for running the aforesaid shop as the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1383 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 2/2 carpenter wood shop has been exempted from license. He further submits that in this regard a letter bearing memo no. 3959 dated 24.12.2012 has been issued (Annexure-2 to this application). Petitioners no. 1 and 2 have two criminal antecedents and petitioner no. 3 has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Andhrathadhi P.S. Case No. 113 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T