← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1713/2018disposed

Jharu Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar, Through The District Magistrate, Banka And ORS

2019-09-05Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1713 of 2018 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 189 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Jharu Mahto, Son of Late Huro Mahto, resident of village - Bishunpur, P.O. and P.S. Chanan, District - Banka.

2.

Bhairo Yadav, Son of Jharu Mahto, resident of village Bishunpur, P.S. Chanan, District - Banka.

3.

Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, Son of Samroo Prasad Yadav, resident of village - Satya Bhaiya, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Chanan, District- Banka. 4.

Ganesh Lal Yadav, Son of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, retired - Dafadar, Chadan/Anandpur, resident of village - Satyabhaiya, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Chandan, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through Sri Kundan Kumar, District Magistrate, Banka. 2.

Sri Aamir Subhani, the State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri, P. K. Tarun, the Officer-on-duty Cum Officer-in-charge District- General Branch, Chandan, Banka.

4.

Sri Kanhaiya Lal, the Officer on duty cum Officer-in-charge District Public Grievance Cell, Banka, District - Banka.

5.

Sri Kaushal Kishore Sinha, Circle Officer, Chandan, Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, AC to AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 The matter has been disposed off on 05.09.2019. It has been placed at the instance of the office pointing out typographical error in orders dated 19.06.2019; 14.08.2019 and 05.09.2019, inasmuch as, the serial number of the said orders should have been 3, 4 and 5, whereas it has been typed as 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

Patna High Court MJC No.1713 of 2018(5) dt.01-10-2019 2/2

2. The contention of the office is correct.

3. Accordingly, the serial number of orders dated 19.06.2019; 14.08.2019 and 05.09.2019, be read as 3, 4 and 5 in place of 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U