← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84721/2023rejected

Nirbhay Kumar Mandal Alias Nirbhay Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84721 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2023 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Nirbhay Kumar Mandal Alias Nirbhay Mandal S/O-Khananjay Mandal R/O Vill- Amarpur. P.S. Bakharpur, (PIRPAINTI ) Dist-Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 242 of 2023 (arising out of Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 224 of 2023) lodged under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354B, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C. read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the F.I.R., the allegation has been made against three named accused persons that they used to assault the informant's daughter with a view to marry her when she used to visit school.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the victim has narrated her statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. in which she has made allegation of harassment and to put pressure upon her to marry with him as acknowledged in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84721 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/2 rejection order of the Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur. Counsel further submits that the allegation of POCSO has not been attracted in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that due to action of the petitioner, it is very difficult for the victim to do the normal work and visit school.

6. Upon specific query whether charge has been framed or not. Counsel submits that as per his knowledge, charge has not been framed till date.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

8. However, trial court is directed to release him on bail imposing conditions so that he may not evade his appearance during trial.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T